In the world of hockey, the age-old tradition of fights has long been a spectacle that fans crave, even if it's an absurd ritual. The recent anniversary of a high-profile brawl between the Red Wings and Avalanche serves as a reminder of the performativeness of these fights, where the act of fighting itself brings something into being. However, the modern game is moving towards a safer and more peaceful version, which has led to fewer and less intense brawls. This shift raises questions about the value and authenticity of these fights, especially when they are arranged or staged.
The philosophical principle of performativity, which refers to the use of words or acts that bring something into being, is particularly relevant here. In hockey, a fight can strengthen the bond between teammates, not because of hatred or revenge, but because it's what teammates are 'supposed' to do. This 'supposed to' dynamic is what makes the recent Maple Leafs vs. Radko Gudas throwdown so intriguing. The Leafs were criticized for not seeking immediate revenge on Gudas, who injured their captain, Auston Matthews. However, Gudas' willingness to face the consequences and take responsibility for his actions, despite his injury, raises questions about the nature of these fights.
The epistemology of a hockey fight becomes even more confusing when one party doesn't bother fighting back. Gudas' decision to stand and take the punches, rather than fight back, suggests that the fight was more about making a statement than about physical dominance. This raises the question of whether the fight was genuine or simply a ritualistic display. The Leafs' decision to fire their GM a few hours after the game, and the overall lack of physical retaliation, suggests that the fight was more about satisfying the fans and the media than about actual revenge.
In my opinion, the value of these fights lies not in their physical outcomes, but in the social cohesion they provide. They serve as a way to reinforce the bonds between teammates and to create a sense of community. However, the modern game is moving away from these fights, which raises questions about the future of this tradition. Will these fights become a thing of the past, or will they evolve into something new?
One thing is certain: the ritual of fighting in hockey is not always logical, but it serves a purpose. It provides entertainment, relief, and a sense of community. Whether or not these fights are genuine, they are an integral part of the sport's culture. As fans, we may crave these moments, even if they are absurd. But in the end, it's the ritual itself that matters, not the physical outcome.
